




| Subject: NBA Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 From: "Kevin" <_________@comcast.net> To: jcouture at s-t dot com Hi Jon, You offer a spirited defense of the NBA, but watch any old game on ESPN Classic and you will see how bad the game is today. NO one can shoot. Where are the George Gervins and Alex Englishes? Guys who could really shoot and score, yet average 50% from the field. The fundamentals are lousy. Jason Kidd is one of the few point guards who can pass and run a fast break. The shot selection of star players like Iverson, Pierce, Bryant is terrible. Too many young players who have no concept what they're supposed to be doing on a basketball court. It's sad because when it's played properly at the highest level, it's a beautiful game. Give me the guys from the 1980s. Kevin |
| Subject: About Your NBA Column Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 From: "Frank ___" <_____@verizon.net> To: jcouture at s-t dot com I think your analogies are a little flawed. First of all, a pitcher's duel in baseball is a whole other thing, because the pitcher is so prominent. Similarly, though I adore hockey, I only find a 0-0 hockey game entertaining if it's because of the goalies. If it's 0-0 because both teams are playing that New Jersey Devils clutch-and-grab 'neutral zone trap' and there's 30 shots on net total for both teams, it's like watching paint dry. I feel the same way about the NBA--which I do sometimes watch So, I think the low-scoring NBA can get boring not because of good defense, but becauce midrange jump shooting is getting to be a lost art. Those glory teams of the eighties--Celtics, Lakers, Bulls--all had mulitple players who could hit a midrange jumper. That keeps defenses honest. And don't even get me started on free throws! Best, Frank __ Peabody, MA |



| Subject: Lowe Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 From: "Gerard _____" <_______@hotmail.com> To: jcouture at s-t dot com Dear Jon Your column on Derek Lowe in today's issue was a little harsh considering the 'bad luck' that seems to surface when Lowe is pitching. He is not alone in that respect but it does affect him longer than other pitchers on the staff. The fact he is not a strike out pitcher similar to Pedro and Schilling, also makes him more dependant on his fielders. They can rear back and throw heat and get the K. A case in point would be in Sunday's game with runners at 2nd and 3rd and Sweeney up at the plate. Sweeney's lifetime average against Lowe is over .500, the pitching coach comes to the mound and they discuss, I would imagine, this information and how they will pitch him. With first base open one would think the plan was make him hit 'my pitch'. Every single pitch he made to Sweeney was low and inside. We are talking Major League players who make millions to play the game and with two strikes and a couple of foul balls to the left, Sweeney gets a double down the third base line that an all-star little leaguer could have played. Mueller (pronounced Miller?) was playing so far off the line you would have thought Giambi was at the plate. Maybe his position is 3rd base (pronounced shortstop?). I have been a Red Sox fan for 55 years and have never seen baseball played so 'stupid' as the last couple of years. First pitch swinging into double plays after the pitcher just walked two batters. The premise that he is trying to get a strike flies in the face of the fact he just failed 8 times, he is struggling. If he fails again the pressure really mounts, if he throws a strike, a Major League ballplayer should be able to hit with one strike. Last but not least, all the stats you gave about ERA and run support, are offset by the number of errors made, both mentally and physically. There were many games lost last year that didn't seem important at the time. They were lost through 'bad playing', 'bad coaching' and 'bad decision making'. We only remember the last. But come October if we again are playing our final game on the 'road', will anyone remember this error of omission or just a bad outing by Lowe? |

